Wednesday, October 30, 2013

"Growing Pains" at the SC State Farmer Market


Earlier this month, there was an article in the Post and Courier called “Growing Pains”, which is about the new location of the state farmer market. The market was recently moved to West Columbia from central Columbia in 2010, and it hasn’t been doing well ever since. Although money has been raised to make new additions to the market, many feel that the state should hold off on pumping more money into it until it becomes more stable. In this sense, the choice of what to do to improve the market is very controversial.

In terms of the purpose of this market, South Carolina’s primary interest is to promote the sales of South Carolina produce, then to aid wholesalers, and then to spur retails. Another goal of the state is to adjust the private- public partnership through this market. The market is not only bringing together the public and private sectors, but also many different groups of farmers.

So why isn’t the market making much money? The answer is competition. As the “buy local” movement becomes increasingly popular, there are many farmers markets being created all over the state. These markets are highly competitive with the state farmers market. In addition, there seems to be a great deal of controversy over who should control the state farmer’s market. Many argue that Lexington County and the city of Columbia ought to control the market since it is located in their area.

As one can imagine, it is difficult for farmers to stay at this market without generating much profit. Some farmers that sell at the state market are unhappy because they don’t agree with having to pay $15-$20 for their trucks to come onto the property to drop off the produce, which goes towards the savings for the market as a whole. Many farmers are frustrated and only stay out of hopes for improvement. Many think that new improvements to the market will draw in more customers.

As we can see through this article, the state is trying to get involved in the farmer market business in hopes that it will be a great investment for the future of South Carolina. The public has yet to see if the market will have a turn- around. Many are waiting to see if the state will intervene with the situation and decide to invest the money they have raised to further fortify this market.  


Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Conference With Chip Petrea....One Shoe Does Not Fit All


This past Friday, I had a phone conference with Chip Petrea. Mr. Petrea is a principal research specialist on Ag safety and health at the University of Illinois. He is highly involved in the Illinois AgrAbility Project, as well as the Ag Safety and Health Network. Mr. Petrea’s passion stems from his first hand experience of injury on the farm. In a previous blog post, I mentioned the article on Mr. Petrea in “Beyond the Bean”, which explains Mr. Petrea’s main focus- educating other farmers on farm safety in a unique way.


Here is a summary of my conference with Mr. Petrea:

1. I asked him about the points he covers in his presentations on farm safety.
His response was that he tries not to focus on the “do’s and don’ts”, but he will give basic advice. For an example, he usually recommends farmers to purchase ROPS, which is a structure that is similar to a car roof, but on a tractor. He also recommends that all farmers wear seatbelts in the tractor if the tractor provides it. He told me that he focuses on behavior, and how that might affect farm safety. For an example, many farmers allow their children to drive the combine down the road, but is that safe? In small farming communities, many people give their children a little more freedom- it is a different culture. Mr. Petrea said that he studies these types of behaviors and identifies the specific behaviors that are largely contributing to farm- related accidents.

2. I inquired about how stress of a farmer differs from the stress of a regular civilian, and how that stress might distort behaviors in a farming community.
Mr. Petrea explained that much of farmers’ stress comes with meeting demands. When it comes to farming as a profession, there are not many ways to be flexible in meeting their demands, which largely differs from the more freely given flexibility in normal civilian life. Additionally, he explained that farming communities are very different in general because it is a much tighter community. This means that an individual in a rural community is unlikely to be accepted as a member of society if he or she does not agree with the common views on religion, politics, parenthood, etc. These pressures greatly impact the way of life in a farming community. As a result, similar behaviors seem more common and stress seems to be augmented in a farming community.

3. Lastly, I asked what happens to farmers that get injured on the farm, and if there are any programs currently in place to cater specifically to farmers upon injury.
Mr. Petrea says that there are 24 registered states for the Disabled Farmers Program. He says that many farmers who get injured, however, do not reach out to this program either because it requires too much paperwork for the result, because the farm agents are unaware and uninformed, or because of some other reason. He explained that this is not the fault of the program itself- it is very hard to reach out to farmers in need. Although many farmers check their emails to receive notifications about programs, many still remain disconnected- maybe because they ignore it or aren’t interested at the time. Mr. Petrea is confident that many farmers need convincing to get aid. Many are too afraid to reach out for help on their own, because they know that it might mean rehabilitation and time away from the farm. In terms of on- site assistance upon occurrence of a farm accident, Mr. Petrea told me that there is no direct training that the government provides in case of farm accidents specifically. Therefore, rescue teams must apply what they do in case of a car accident to farm accidents. Once the injured farmer is transferred to the hospital, he or she is provided the same treatment as those that suffer from automobile injuries. Mr. Petrea highlighted the point that in case of farm accident, there is no help specifically for farmers either on the sight of the accident, or for farmers’ medical treatment following the accident. Many farmers are provided with prosthetic designs that work efficiently in normal civilian’s life, but are not designed for the tasks involved in a farmer’s life.

I have synthesized from this interview and from other resources I have been studying this month that there needs to be aid given to farmers that is modeled to help them specifically. One of the main resources I investigated was Obama care, and how it will affect farmers specifically as a group. The answer is that farmers will be affected the same as every other citizen- there is no provision in Obama care that caters specifically to farmers. In other words, “one shoe fits all” through Obama care. Through my research, I have approached a conclusion. Farmers have a very unique way of life, and their needs should be catered to specifically through both economic and medical aid. I believe that the enhancement of these specific programs would be a great investment in America’s time and money. After all, farmers are the future… especially with the rapid increase in global population and world hunger. 


Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Precision Agriculture... So Interesting!

Lately, precision agriculture has been somewhat of a "hot topic" in the ag world. As I have mentioned in previous blog posts, this is the idea that farmers should apply nutrients to crops based on what they need, instead of covering whole fields with additives or water that will cause excess run-offs. 
Science Daily has two particularly good articles about this technique. The first article quotes a well known agronomist named Raj Khosla; "Precision agriculture is a grossly misunderstood field...the principles can be applied to 2 acres of 2,000 acres". That is the beauty of this farming technique- it is new, innovative, and can be altered to fit any type of farm. Whether this concept is used by a large- scale cotton farmer or a small- scale tobacco farmer, all of the farmers must be creative with the technique. The second article from Science Daily explains how geostatistics is used in precision agriculture. It also highlights the positive outcomes of precision agriculture, which include the improvement of the farm economy and the crop health, as well as the improvement of food security (which is a very pressing issue as the environment is faced with more and more biological limiting factors due to the poor stewardship towards the environment). The links to the articles are posted below: 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131008152051.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130423110747.htm
I decided to go a little deeper into how precision ag works. I stumbled upon an online program called "ArcGIS Software" that provides help with geostatistics. The spatial technology solution helps farmers make the best use of their land, whether for the production of agricultural food crops, biomass material, or both through the evaluation of fertilizer treatments. Based on fertilizer type, amount, and distribution, the difference in crop yield is included in the cost/productivity calculation as a final result. In all, the software provides help with all of the following: 
-dynamic modeling
-advanced visualization
-statistical analysis purposes
-sustainability analysis
-surface analysis
-math analysis
-cost path analysis (of traveling from one point to another)
-density mapping
-distance analysis
-weighted analysis
-suitblility analysis
-demographics
-fire risk 
Here are some images to help better understand the technique and how it works. The red spots indicate areas lacking in the particular nutrient. 

McGill University offers an easy- access tutorial on how to operate the ArcGIS Software for Precision Agriculture, free of charge: 

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

"Beyond the Bean"

According to the September 2013 issue of Beyond the Bean, US soybean farmers are the "most committed to responsible production and continuous improvement". This magazine is solely for soybean farmers, and this issue focuses on how processors should determine the cash prices they pay farmers based on the protein and oil inside the soybeans. Many US soybean farmers use sustainable practices such as soil and water conservation, reduced tillage, precision application of nutrients, crop protection chemicals, and biotechnology. According to this issue, there might be a great opportunity for US soybean farmers in India as it rapidly develops and grows. Most of the yields from soybean farmers in the US goes to the animal- ag sector, since soybean meal is the most healthy feed for animals that humans consume.
Reading this magazine was very relevant to South Carolinian small-scale farming success, since many crop farmers in South Carolina farm soybeans. A notable upcoming technology for soybean farmers that the magazine includes is the UAV, which is a super cam adapted from drone technology. This high- precision tool can fly over fields and spot insects at leaf level, or even identify nitrogen deficiencies within a row. Congress has recently asked the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop guidelines for UAV use by 2015, because as of right now, UAV technology can only be legally used at universities. Although this technology may not be practical for really small farms, it would definitely be practical for small farms on the larger end of the spectrum.
Another significant development mentioned in the magazine was local- leadership conferences to help educate local farmers on how to prevent farm accident. Chip Petrea, a professor at the University of Illinois, experienced a farm accident years ago on the farm. He is currently studying how stress can affect behavior, which can consequently cause farm accidents. His presentations rarely share the "do's and dont's" of farm safety, but rather the discussion of how behaviors can be distorted when under stress. I contacted Mr. Petrea, and hopefully he will be willing to share more about his research in the prevention of farm accidents. The success of many farmers is largely hindered by health issues, health care, farming accidents, and things of this nature. Most of the farmers that I have interviewed ranked health care and related issues as one of the most difficult barriers to overcome. I plan to further investigate how Obama Care might change this issue in agriculture, and how steps towards the prevention of health issues can be tackled at a more local level.
I love these farming magazines... they provide such brilliant and innovative ways to help combat the barriers in farming success!

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

“The Progressive Farmer” Review

This week I read "The Progressive Farmer" September 2013 issue. The caption on the front of the magazine is "Facing a Food Cliff? Agriculture is under pressure to find new sustainable solutions to feed a hungry world". The letter from the editor in this issue elaborates on the caption displayed on the cover. Chief Greg Hillyer, editor in chief of the magazine, references Jim Borel, the executive president at Dupont in explaining the upcoming world food crisis. For those of you that don't know, Dupont is a very unique company that partners with others to "tackle unprecedented challenges in food, energy, and protection now facing our world". Hillyer states that "mankind may need nothing short of a Green Revolution to meet the future food demand". Borel states that in order for farmers to meet the high demands for food due to mass population growth, food security must be reached by achieving the following goals: creating "local wisdom"science, local food- security solutions, collaborative efforts, and sustainable solutions. In the broadest sense, the movement required to take on the challenge of the upcoming food crisis will include "economic, social, as well as environmental" changes.
This issue contains many articles that address particular economic, social, and environemental issues and provide solutions.  My favorite is called "Water, Water (Not Everywhere), by Boyd Kidwell. This article is about how variable- rate irrigation lowers water costs and protects the environment. The article starts with a success story of a farmer named Preston Jimmerson in Doerun, GA that received grant money from the NRCS and SWCD to pay for the installation of a VRI, or variable- rate irrigation from Advanced Ag Systems Inc. Without VRI, Jimmerson claims that he was wasting irrigation water on 25 acres with every pass, plus overwatering. Now that he uses VRI to cut off zones of wasted water, he claims to save enough to do one extra irrigation cycle. Whereas conventional irrigation systems apply the same rate of water to all soils and areas, the farmer is able to control what areas receive water based on the hydration needs of the different soil types in those areas. In the Flint Basin, where Jimmerson farms, 15 billion gallons of water are saved per year already, since 75% of the farmers in that area have adopted VRI technology. This option is also open to South Carolina farmers, and I highly encourage local farmers to reach out to this technology. Clemson University has offered help to South Carolinian farmers in the past in the implementation of VRI. EQUIP is prepared to help South Carolinian farmers find cost- share help for this technology, as this state is a part of the NRCS Southeast Region.
http://www.dupont.com  Here is a link to the innovative and purposeful website of Dupont